Liying in Psychological Assessments: Evaluation of the Malinger Attitude in a Forensic Sample


  • Francisco Valente Gonçalves EY Forensic & Integrity Services, Lisboa, Portugal
  • Rui Mateus Joaquim Instituto Pauista de Estudos Bioéticos e Jurídicos (IPEBJ), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
  • Sara Ferreira Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  • Miguel Ângelo Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Instituto Universitário, Lisboa, Portugal
  • Leonardo Ferreira Faria Polícia Técnico-Científica do Estado de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brasil



Lying, Malingering, Psychological Assessment


When it is necessary to evaluate the false attitude, such as lying, in a forensic examination, the professionals who carry out this type of work have limited resources to which they can resort. One of the reasons is the small investment in research in the area of ​​lie evaluation. Still on this point, evaluating the lie is an extremely complex task, with several views that one may have to carry out such action. One possible way to observe false attitudes is to analyze the presence of malinger attitudes. However, psychometric assessment tools for this area are also scarce and not very scientifically elegant. Finally, and most importantly, there is a lack of investigation where the samples are entirely forensic. The present work presents a description of a forensic sample (n = 470) regarding the type of malinger attitude present and its sociodemographic characteristics. There are some points of interest in some types of social characteristics such as the type of academic qualification or the type of profession. The type of legal process to which the subjects being assessed seem to be important to consider and finally there is a correlation of about 13% in which the subjects' intelligence explains their malinger attitude. Further studies are needed. The data presented in this work are of interest to professionals in the specialty, but above all, they are believed as a step towards having a line of comparison for scientific investment in the future in this area of ​​forensic evaluation.


Singh J, Awasthi A, Grover S. Malingering of Psychiatric Disorders: A Review. German Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;10(4):126-32.

Kluck M-L, Westhoff K. Applied fields: Forensic. In: Fernández-Ballesteros R, editor. Encyclopedia of Psychological Assessment. London: Sage Publications; 2003. p. 59-62

Gonçalves FV. Avaliação Psicológica em Contexto Forense: Desafios e Diálogos na Determinação da Mentira. In: Paulino M, Alho L, coordenadores. Comportamento Criminal e Avaliação Forense. Pactor: Lisboa; 2018. p. 21-38.

Gonçalves, FV. Dissimulaçao do desespero: Uma Realidade da Regulação das Responsabilidades Parentais em Portugal. Direito em Debate. 2015;24(43):47-61.

Agulhas R, Anciães A. Casos Práticos em Psicologia Forense. Lisboa: Edições Silabo; 2014.

Rogers R. An introduction to response styles. Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York, NY: Guildford Press; 2008. pp. 3-13.

Rogers R, Correa AA. Determinations of malingering: Evolution from case-based methods to detection strategies. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2008. 15, 213-23.

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5th ed. Washington, DC; 2013.

Rogers R, Salekin RT, Sewell KW, Goldstein A, Leonard K. A comparison of forensic and nonforensic malingerers: a prototypical analysis of explanatory models. Law and human behavior, 1998;22:353-67.

Wygant DB, Anderson JL, Sellbom M, Rapier JL, Allgeier LM et al. Association of the MMPI-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales with structured malingering criteria. Psychological Injury and Law. 2011;4(1):13-23.

Resnick PJ, West S, Payne JW. Malingering on posttraumatic disorders. In: Rogers R, editor. Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York, NY: Guildford Press; 2008. p. 109-27.

Taylor S, Fruch BC, Asmundson GJG. Detection and management of malingering in people presenting for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: Methods, obstacles and recommendations. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2006;21(1):22-41.

Kitchen R. Investigating benefit fraud and illness deception in the United Kingdom. In: Halligan PW, Bass C, Oakley DA, editors. Malingering and illness deception. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 313-322

Gonçalves FV, Pires A, Vila-Real A. O Sujeito Simulador na Avaliação Psicológica Forense. Direito em Debate. 2017;26(47):332-49.

Tarescavage AM, Wygant DB, Gervais RO, Ben-Porath YS. Association between the MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among non-head injury disability claimants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2013;27(2): 313-35.

Sellbom M, Toomey JA, Wygant DB, Kucharski LT, Duncan S. Utility of the MMPI–2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: A known-groups design. Psychological Assessment. 2010;22(1):22-31.

Rogers R, Vitacco MJ, Kurus SJ. Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: Patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 2009;38(1):109-14.

Hathaway SR, McKinley JC. A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): I. Construction of the schedule. The Journal of Psychology. 1940;10(2):249-54.

Kincannon JC. Prediction of the standard MMPI scale scores from 71 items: the Mini-Mult. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 1968;32(3):319-25.

Tracy DK, Rix KJ. Malingering mental disorders: Clinical assessment. BJPsych Advances. 2017;23:27-35.

Drob SL, Meehan KB, Waxman SE. Clinical and conceptual problems in the attribution of malingering in forensic evaluations. The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 2009;37(1):98-106.

Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH. Raven Manual: Section 4, Advanced Progressive Matrices, 1998 Edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press Ltd; 1998.

Cunha JA. MMPI: Escalas de validade e escalas clínicas. In: Cunha JÁ, editor, Psicodiagnóstico-V (pp. 454-479). (5ª edição revisada e ampliada). Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 2008. p. 454-79.

IBM Corp. Released. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2017

Marôco JP. Análise estatística com o PASW Statistics (ex-SPSS). Ed. 1. Report Number: Pêro Pinheiro; 2010

Edens JF, Poythress NG, Watkins-clay MM. Detection of Malingering in Psychiatric Unit and General Population Prison Inmates: A Comparison of the PAI, SIMS, and SIRS. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2007;88(1):33-42.

Mason AM, Cardell R, Armstrong M. Malingering Psychosis: Guidelines for Assessment and Management. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care. 2014;50(1):51-7.

Mittenberg W, Patton C, Canyock EM, Condit DC. Base rate of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2002;24(8):1094-102.

Hall RCW, Hall RCW. Malingering of PTSD: forensic and diagnostic considerations, characteristics of malingerers and clinical presentations. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2006;28(6):525-35.

Berry DTR, Nelson NW. DSM-5 and malingering: A modest proposal. Psychological Injury and Law. 2010;3(4):295–303.

Wallace ER, Garcia-Willingham NE, Walls BD, Bosch CM, Balthrop KC, Berry DTR. A meta-analysis of malingering detection measures for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychological Assessment. 2019;31(2):265–70.

Código Penal Português. Coimbra: Almedina; 2007.

LeBourgeois HW. Malingering: Key points in assessment. Psychiatric Times. 2007;24(4):21-9.



How to Cite

Gonçalves, F. V., Joaquim, R. M., Ferreira, S., Ângelo, M., & Ferreira Faria, L. (2020). Liying in Psychological Assessments: Evaluation of the Malinger Attitude in a Forensic Sample. Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics, 10(1), 48-69.



Original Article